Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Macrons’ Defamation Case Tests U.S. Libel Law as CNN Panel Rips Candace Owens

Analysts say Owens faces steep hurdles in proving her claims were made without actual malice in the Macrons’ 22-count lawsuit filed this week.

Image
Image
Image
Image

Overview

  • The Macrons filed a 22-count defamation suit in Delaware Superior Court on July 23 accusing Owens of maliciously spreading false claims that Brigitte Macron was born male and involved in a CIA-backed mind-control scheme.
  • Owens has vowed to fight the lawsuit, declaring she is prepared to “take on this battle on behalf of the entire world” and will “see you in court.”
  • On CNN’s Table for Five, data analyst Harry Enten labeled Owens’s claims “one of the dumbest arguments” he’d ever heard and called her “stupid” and “disgusting.”
  • Panelist Jemele Hill said Owens must prove she acted without intentional malice and questioned how she expects to meet the high actual malice standard under U.S. defamation law.
  • The case underscores tensions between U.S. First Amendment protections and French libel rules as Brigitte Macron continues her appeal in France’s highest court.