Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Lawyers Clash Over Dismissal of Uvalde Families’ Suit Against Activision and Meta

Los Angeles County Superior Court weighs whether First Amendment or Section 230 protections can shield the companies from the families’ lawsuit

From left, Felix Rubio, Kim Rubio and attorney Josh Koskoff arrive for a court hearing in a lawsuit between victims' families in the 2022 Uvalde, Texas school shooting and Meta Platforms on Friday, July 18, 2025, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Eric Thayer)
Image
From left to right, Jerry Mata, Veronica Mata, Javier Cazares and Gloria Cazares arrive for a court hearing in a lawsuit between victims' families in the 2022 Uvalde, Texas school shooting and Meta Platforms on Friday, July 18, 2025, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Eric Thayer)
Javier Cazares, left, and Gloria Cazares arrive for a court hearing in a lawsuit between victims' families in the 2022 Uvalde, Texas school shooting and Meta Platforms on Friday, July 18, 2025, in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Eric Thayer)

Overview

  • At the hearing, families of Robb Elementary victims argued that Instagram ads and “Call of Duty” gameplay glorified gun violence and honed the Uvalde shooter’s skills.
  • Families’ lawyer Josh Koskoff presented internal contracts and emails to show that Activision and firearm makers collaborated on authentic weapon depictions.
  • Meta did not attend the proceedings but faces separate dismissal motions based on Section 230 immunity for user and advertiser content.
  • Judge William Highberger said he remains undecided and is unlikely to issue a ruling on the motions immediately.
  • Daniel Defense remains a defendant accused of securing what the lawsuit calls a “marketing coup” by featuring its AR-15 design in “Call of Duty” to reach minors.