Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Lawmakers and PJM Monitor Press Consumer Protections as Board Preps Data‑Center Rules

Upcoming PJM rule decisions face pressure to keep data‑center grid costs with developers, not customers.

Overview

  • Maryland Sen. Katie Fry Hester launched a PJM State Legislators Collaborative that drew participants from across the 13‑state region to push for safeguards on household bills.
  • PJM’s board plans to finalize a Critical Issue Fast Path proposal on Nov. 19 for a subsequent filing at FERC to address roughly 32 gigawatts of forecast new demand by 2030, mostly from data centers.
  • Independent market monitor Joseph Bowring asked FERC to reject a Sept. 23 transmission service agreement between Peco and Amazon for a massive Bucks County data center, citing unresolved capacity and reliability cost risks.
  • Consumer advocates warn of steep potential rate impacts, including NRDC’s estimate of up to $163 billion through 2033, as Maryland’s Office of People’s Counsel questions PJM’s growth assumptions and urges stronger protections.
  • PJM said the fast‑track process is not about passing costs to ratepayers, noting retail rate decisions rest with states, while Amazon pursues two Pennsylvania data center complexes totaling about $20 billion, including a Luzerne County project that previously saw a 480‑megawatt connection rejected by FERC.