Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Law Firms Challenge Trump’s Executive Orders in Court

Perkins Coie and WilmerHale seek permanent injunctions against punitive measures targeting their operations and legal independence.

President Donald Trump speaks with reporters as he participates in a ceremonial swearing in of Paul Atkins as chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in the Oval Office of the White House, Tuesday, April 22, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Signage is seen outside of the law firm WilmerHale in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 30, 2020. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a swearing-in ceremony for Paul Atkins, chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), not pictured, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Tuesday, April 22, 2025.
Signage is seen outside of the law firm Perkins Coie at their legal offices in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 10, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo

Overview

  • Perkins Coie and WilmerHale are asking federal judges to permanently block executive orders issued by President Trump that they argue are unconstitutional retaliations against their legal work.
  • The executive orders revoke security clearances, restrict federal building access, and terminate government contracts for targeted firms, citing their past representation of political adversaries and diversity policies.
  • Over 800 law firms, along with hundreds of academics, have filed amicus briefs supporting the challenge, though fewer than 20 of the largest Am Law 200 firms have joined publicly.
  • At least nine major law firms have settled with the administration, agreeing to provide nearly $1 billion in pro bono legal services to causes endorsed by Trump to avoid further sanctions.
  • The legal community is divided, as critics warn the orders undermine the independence of lawyers and threaten the legal profession’s role as a check on government power.