Overview
- The Law Commission told the parliamentary panel that the amendment does not require ratification by at least half of the state legislatures under Article 368(2).
- It maintained that synchronising electoral cycles, including curtailed terms to restore alignment, would not violate the Constitution’s basic structure.
- The Commission argued that expanded Election Commission authority, including recommending deferral of polls to enable joint elections, flows from Article 324 and is not an excessive delegation.
- The JPC scheduled consultations on Dec. 10 and Dec. 17 to examine constitutional, operational, economic and administrative issues with invitees such as Kapil Sibal and representatives of the Election Commission.
- Opposition members pressed the panel on federalism, voter choice and the extent of public consultation during the Dec. 4 session, questioning the need and design of the proposal.