Overview
- Justice Jyoti M initially stayed the notification on Tuesday morning on petitions by the Bangalore Hotels Association and Avirata AFL Connectivity Systems Ltd.
- The stay was withdrawn hours later after Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty sought reconsideration, and the court listed the matter for further hearing on Wednesday.
- The government has been directed to file a statement of objections as the High Court examines the notification’s legal basis and procedure.
- The policy mandates one paid day of menstrual leave each month for women aged 18–52 across establishments under multiple labour laws, requires no medical certificate, and bars carryover.
- Petitioners argue the directive lacks statutory authority and stakeholder consultation and conflicts with existing leave regimes, raising Article 14 and operational concerns; Karnataka separately extended the leave to its own employees on December 2.