Overview
- The DOJ filed a civil False Claims Act complaint alleging IEHP made false statements to Medi‑Cal and knowingly retained overpayments.
- The government describes two schemes at the center of the case: sham provider incentive programs and a retroactive rate increase outside the contract.
- Under a contract requiring at least 85% of expansion funds go to allowed medical expenses, prosecutors say IEHP instead used money for administrative costs, other populations, and payments providing no value.
- The complaint cites tactics such as backdating expenditures, routing consultant and technology payments through providers, and internally referring to some transfers as “free money.”
- The coordinated federal–state case involves DOJ, the U.S. Attorney in Los Angeles, the California DOJ, HHS‑OIG, and DHCS; damages are unspecified and the Rancho Cucamonga‑based plan covering about 1.8 million residents had no immediate comment.