Overview
- Justice Clarence Thomas is under fire for not recusing himself from a Supreme Court case concerning the January 6 attack, despite his wife's alleged involvement in the events of that day.
- Critics, including legal analysts and politicians, argue that Thomas' participation in the case poses a conflict of interest and undermines the credibility of the court.
- During oral arguments, Thomas questioned the application of obstruction charges, comparing the Jan. 6 riot to other violent protests, which has sparked further controversy.
- Social media and public figures have expressed outrage, with some calling Thomas' actions 'utter corruption' and 'a disgrace.'
- The Supreme Court has not yet responded to requests for comment on the matter.