Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Jury to Deliberate After Closing Arguments in Erin Patterson Mushroom Poisoning Trial

Defence counsel contested key evidence by questioning Patterson’s motive, highlighting the possibility that mushrooms entered the meal accidentally

Image
Image
Image
Image

Overview

  • Prosecutors and defence have delivered final addresses as jurors prepare to weigh charges that Patterson murdered three relatives and attempted to kill a fourth with death cap mushrooms in a July 2023 lunch
  • Crown counsel Nanette Rogers accused Patterson of orchestrating four calculated deceptions, including fabricating a cancer diagnosis to lure her in-laws and deliberately lacing individual beef Wellingtons while sparing herself
  • Evidence cited includes phone-tower data placing Patterson near known mushroom sites, forensic traces of death caps in a discarded dehydrator, plate-switching to avoid self-poisoning and concealment of her primary mobile phone with a dummy device
  • Defence barrister Colin Mandy argued the prosecution’s narrative was flawed and that Patterson lacked any motive to harm her family, insisting there is a reasonable possibility the mushroom contamination was accidental
  • Presiding Judge Christopher Beale will instruct jurors before they retire to decide whether the evidence establishes intentional poisoning or supports the defence’s account of a tragic accident