Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Jury Acquits Virginia Man Accused of Soliciting Trump Assassination After Two-Day Trial

Jurors concluded his violent posts did not meet the specificity required for criminal solicitation under First Amendment limits.

Overview

  • An Alexandria federal jury found Peter A. Stinson not guilty after roughly two hours of deliberation following a two-day trial.
  • Prosecutors cited years of social media posts urging violence, including statements like “I’d pull the trigger,” offers to “serve in a support capacity,” and proposals to raise money for a “contract hit.”
  • The judge instructed jurors that speech advocating violence at an indefinite time remains protected unless it crosses into specific, actionable solicitation.
  • Defense testimony from University of Maryland professor Jen Golbeck described Stinson’s rhetoric as common online and argued the government selectively pursued his case.
  • Stinson, a former Coast Guard lieutenant and longtime FEMA instructor, said he was thrilled by the verdict, expressed no regret over his posts, and vowed to continue protesting.