Overview
- President Trump’s executive orders targeted law firms Perkins Coie and WilmerHale, revoking security clearances, restricting federal access, and terminating contracts, citing their ties to his political adversaries.
- Federal Judges Beryl Howell and Richard Leon have temporarily blocked key provisions of the orders and are now considering permanent injunctions, with Howell questioning their constitutionality.
- The Justice Department defended the orders as lawful, but Howell criticized the lack of evidence and described the administration’s actions as reminiscent of McCarthy-era tactics.
- Nine law firms have settled with the Trump administration, collectively pledging nearly $1 billion in pro bono services, while others, including Perkins Coie and WilmerHale, continue to challenge the orders in court.
- The legal community remains divided, with many firms silent or settling, raising concerns about the erosion of attorney independence and the broader implications for the rule of law.