Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Judges Signal Possible Block on Trump's Executive Orders Targeting Law Firms

Federal judges express skepticism over the constitutionality of Trump’s sanctions against Perkins Coie and WilmerHale, as legal battles intensify.

President Donald Trump speaks with reporters as he participates in a ceremonial swearing in of Paul Atkins as chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, in the Oval Office of the White House, Tuesday, April 22, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Signage is seen outside of the law firm WilmerHale in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 30, 2020. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo
U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a swearing-in ceremony for Paul Atkins, chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), not pictured, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C., U.S., on Tuesday, April 22, 2025.

Overview

  • President Trump’s executive orders targeted law firms Perkins Coie and WilmerHale, revoking security clearances, restricting federal access, and terminating contracts, citing their ties to his political adversaries.
  • Federal Judges Beryl Howell and Richard Leon have temporarily blocked key provisions of the orders and are now considering permanent injunctions, with Howell questioning their constitutionality.
  • The Justice Department defended the orders as lawful, but Howell criticized the lack of evidence and described the administration’s actions as reminiscent of McCarthy-era tactics.
  • Nine law firms have settled with the Trump administration, collectively pledging nearly $1 billion in pro bono services, while others, including Perkins Coie and WilmerHale, continue to challenge the orders in court.
  • The legal community remains divided, with many firms silent or settling, raising concerns about the erosion of attorney independence and the broader implications for the rule of law.