Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Judge Questions Scope of Court Power as Youths Seek to Halt Trump's Energy Orders

A decision on an injunction or dismissal now hinges on the judge's view of his authority following two days of live testimony.

Overview

  • Twenty-two plaintiffs asked a federal judge in Missoula for a preliminary injunction blocking three executive orders that expand drilling, curb electric-vehicle markets, declare a national energy emergency, and prioritize coal extraction.
  • The Justice Department, joined by 19 states and Guam, urged dismissal, arguing the case is undemocratic and echoes the failed Juliana litigation.
  • Judge Dana Christensen pressed plaintiffs’ counsel on whether granting relief would force the court to supervise future executive actions on climate policy.
  • Plaintiffs presented live testimony from youth and experts including John Podesta, climate scientist Steven Running, pediatrician Lori Byron, and economist Geoffrey Heal, while the government called no witnesses.
  • Testimony detailed health and environmental harms to children from heat, wildfire smoke, and floods and challenged the administration’s energy-emergency rationale, with a ruling now pending.