Overview
- U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell ruled that President Trump's executive order targeting Perkins Coie was unconstitutional retaliation, permanently blocking its enforcement.
- The executive order had revoked security clearances, limited federal building access, and terminated government contracts for Perkins Coie lawyers, citing their representation of political opponents like Hillary Clinton.
- Howell's decision highlighted Trump's public boasting about compliance deals with other firms as evidence of punitive intent, further solidifying the case against the administration.
- Nine law firms, including Skadden Arps, pledged $940 million in pro bono work to avoid sanctions, sparking internal resignations, alumni protests, and client reevaluations of firm independence.
- Legal commentators warn that these actions set a dangerous precedent, threatening the independence of the legal profession and the adversarial system in U.S. courts.