Judge Dismisses News Outlets' Copyright Case Against OpenAI
A federal judge ruled that Raw Story and AlterNet failed to demonstrate concrete harm from OpenAI's use of their content.
- The lawsuit, filed in February 2024, accused OpenAI of using copyrighted content from Raw Story and AlterNet to train ChatGPT without proper attribution.
- Judge Colleen McMahon dismissed the case, stating the plaintiffs did not show evidence of concrete injury as required for legal standing.
- The ruling highlighted the difficulty of proving specific content infringement due to the vast amount of data used in AI training.
- Raw Story and AlterNet may amend their complaint, though the judge expressed skepticism about proving tangible harm.
- This decision may influence other ongoing copyright cases against AI companies, as it raises questions about the need for licensing agreements.