Judge Cannon Faces Criticism for Rulings Favoring Trump in Classified Documents Case

Legal experts and prosecutors express concern over Judge Aileen Cannon's decisions, fearing witness intimidation and case delays.

Judge Aileen Cannon's rulings in Trump's Mar-a-Lago case have sparked criticism for potentially favoring the former president and risking witness safety.
Prosecutors argue that Cannon's decisions could lead to witness intimidation and harassment, citing threats already made against individuals involved in the case.
Legal experts warn that Cannon's rulings might be overturned on appeal, highlighting a pattern of decisions that could delay the trial.
Special Counsel Jack Smith challenges Cannon's orders, emphasizing the need to protect witness identities and the integrity of the investigation.
Concerns rise over Cannon's impartiality, with some calling for her recusal due to perceived bias in Trump's favor.