Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Judge Bars Use of Co-Accused’s Statement in Senzo Meyiwa Trial

The judge cited constitutional fairness to limit cross-examination to each accused's own statements.

Overview

  • Judge Ratha Mokgoatlheng ruled on 10 November that prosecutors may not question Muzi Sibiya using a statement by co-accused Bongani Ntanzi.
  • The court found that relying on one accused’s statement against another risks infringing Section 9 equality protections and Section 35 fair-trial rights.
  • Mokgoatlheng noted the court has not definitively classified the statements by Sibiya and Ntanzi as confessions because they are not unequivocal admissions of guilt.
  • The statements were admitted as evidence in March 2024 after a prior ruling found they were made voluntarily despite defence claims of coercion.
  • On 11 November, during continued cross-examination, Sibiya declined to identify people in photos extracted from Mthobisi Mncube’s phone, saying the device was not his.