Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Judge Backs 23XI and Front Row on Market Definition in NASCAR Antitrust Case

The decision sets up a jury test of NASCAR's conduct, increasing settlement pressure before the Dec. 1 trial.

Oct 27, 2024; Homestead, Florida, USA; 23XI team owner Michael Jordan watches during the Straight Talk Wireless 400 at Homestead-Miami Speedway. Mandatory Credit: Jasen Vinlove-Imagn Images/ File Photo

Overview

  • U.S. District Judge Kenneth D. Bell granted partial summary judgment defining the relevant market as premier stock-car racing with NASCAR in control.
  • NASCAR’s bid to end the case was denied, leaving a jury to decide whether the series maintained market power through anticompetitive acts.
  • The court leaned on NASCAR’s own counterclaim framing of the market, finding the sanctioning body cannot argue different market definitions depending on the posture of the case.
  • Bell indicated the 2025 charter framework could be viewed as a restraint on teams seeking Cup Series entry, putting the system’s legality at risk at trial.
  • The trial is set for Dec. 1 in Charlotte; NASCAR called the ruling legally flawed and signaled a possible appeal, while Commissioner Steve Phelps said the series is trying to settle.