Judge Allows Defamation Suit Against Deadspin Over Chiefs Fan Article
A Delaware judge ruled that Deadspin's portrayal of a young Chiefs fan was potentially defamatory, allowing the lawsuit to proceed.
- The lawsuit was filed by the family of a 9-year-old boy after Deadspin published an article accusing him of racist behavior at a football game.
- The article included a photo showing only one side of the boy's face painted black, omitting that the other side was painted red, in support of the Kansas City Chiefs.
- Judge Sean P. Lugg found Deadspin's statements about the boy's motives to be provably false and therefore actionable in a defamation case.
- Deadspin argued that their article was an opinion piece protected by the First Amendment, but the judge identified a distinction between expressing an opinion and making false factual assertions.
- The case will proceed to the pretrial discovery stage, where both parties will gather evidence, including Deadspin's editorial process and communications.