Judge Allows continued Use of Fire Retardant Despite Pollution of Western Streams
- A judge ruled that chemical retardant dropped by the US Forest Service while fighting wildfires violates federal law by polluting streams in western states.
- The judge allowed the continued use of the retardant to battle wildfires despite the legal violation.
- Environmental groups sued the government after hundreds of retardant drops into waterways over the past decade, arguing the practice went against the Clean Water Act.
- Officials argue the retardant is at times necessary to slow dangerous wildfires that have grown larger and more destructive.
- Halting retardant use could lead to greater environmental damage from uncontrolled wildfires, the judge concluded.