Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Jim Acosta’s AI Interview With Parkland Victim’s Avatar Draws Widespread Condemnation

Critics across the spectrum decried the simulated conversation as exploitative, prompting calls for new ethical guidelines on AI recreations of the deceased.

Image
Image
Image
Image

Overview

  • On August 4, Jim Acosta published a video on his Substack interviewing an AI-generated avatar of Joaquin Oliver created by Change the Ref and his parents to promote gun control.
  • The avatar, trained on Oliver’s writings and audio, urged stronger gun laws, expanded mental health support and community engagement to curb violence.
  • Social media users and journalists labeled the segment “grotesque,” “ghoulish” and “unsettling,” raising concerns about consent and the emotional impact of simulating the dead.
  • Manuel and Patricia Oliver defended the project as a loving tribute that extends their son’s voice, announcing plans for additional AI-driven videos and public appearances.
  • Digital ethics experts and lawmakers have seized on the backlash to demand clear consent, transparency and respectful usage rules for AI recreations of deceased individuals.