J.D. Vance Dismisses New York Verdicts Against Trump as Invalid
Senator Vance argues the verdicts in the E. Jean Carroll cases are politically motivated and unfair to sexual assault victims.
- Sen. J.D. Vance claims New York jury verdicts against Donald Trump in the E. Jean Carroll defamation and sexual assault cases lack validity, citing 'extremely left-wing jurisdictions'.
- Vance, a former critic now supporter of Trump, suggests the cases are funded by political opponents aiming to defeat Trump in court rather than at the ballot box.
- Trump ordered to pay $83.3 million in damages to Carroll; plans to appeal against what he calls a 'Biden Directed Witch Hunt'.
- Vance argues supporting Trump does not worsen the lives of sexual assault victims, calling the focus on such cases 'unfair' and 'ridiculous'.
- LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman, a known Trump opponent, is highlighted by Vance as a significant donor to Carroll's cases against Trump.