Jack Smith's Legal Strategy Aims to Admit Pence Testimony in Trump's Jan. 6 Case
Special Counsel Jack Smith is navigating Supreme Court immunity rulings to introduce evidence against Donald Trump, focusing on unofficial conduct during the January 6th events.
- Smith argues that Trump's interactions with Pence were unofficial, framing them as candidate-to-candidate discussions rather than official presidential conduct.
- The Supreme Court ruling provides a presumption of immunity for official acts, but Smith is challenging this by focusing on Trump's actions as a candidate.
- Smith's strategy involves categorizing Trump's conduct into unofficial actions, such as interactions with state officials and efforts to organize fraudulent electors.
- The legal team is leveraging Trump's use of private actors and exclusion of official White House counsel to argue the unofficial nature of his actions.
- Smith's approach includes presenting evidence of Trump's private communications and public speeches as campaign activities, not presidential duties.