Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Jack Smith’s Lawyers Denounce Hatch Act Inquiry as ‘Imaginary and Unfounded’

The watchdog review follows a Republican referral, testing whether the civil Hatch Act process reaches routine prosecutorial decisions.

This combination of pictures created on November 14, 2024 shows then-U.S. President-elect Donald Trump on November 13, 2024, and then-Special Counsel Jack Smith on June 9, 2023.
FILE - The U.S. Department of Justice logo is seen on a podium before a press conference, May 6, 2025, at the Justice Department in Washington. (AP Photo/Julia Demaree Nikhinson, File)
President Donald Trump listens as he meets with South Korean President Lee Jae Myung in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, Aug. 25, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
Special Counsel Jack Smith can be seen delivering remarks on an unsealed indictment including four felony counts against former U.S. President Donald Trump at the Justice Department on August 1, 2023, in Washington, D.C. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Overview

  • The Office of Special Counsel opened an inquiry after Sen. Tom Cotton alleged Jack Smith tried to influence the 2024 election by fast‑tracking Trump prosecutions, including seeking expedited court review.
  • In a three‑page letter, attorneys Lanny Breuer and Peter Koski rejected the premise of the probe and said Smith’s steps were routine, apolitical, and accepted by the courts under DOJ guidelines.
  • Smith’s lawyers said the watchdog has not contacted them for cooperation and asked to be engaged before any findings are issued.
  • Ethics experts quoted in coverage said applying the Hatch Act to prosecutors’ filings is unlikely, noting scant precedent for treating litigation strategy as political activity.
  • The OSC process is administrative and could take months, and Smith had already ended both Trump cases after the 2024 election under DOJ policy barring prosecution of a sitting president.