Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Indonesia Passes Controversial Military Law Expanding Civilian Roles

The amendments revive concerns about democratic backsliding and potential human rights abuses, as active-duty soldiers gain access to key civilian positions.

Indonesian Military Special Forces personnel march during the 79th Indonesian Military Anniversary celebrations at the National Monument (Monas) complex in Jakarta, Indonesia, October 5, 2024. REUTERS/Ajeng Dinar Ulfiana/File Photo
Student protesters burn a tire during a rally against the passing of a new military law allowing active military personnel to hold more civilian posts, outside the parliament in Jakarta, Indonesia, Thursday, March 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Tatan Syuflana)
Indonesian Army personnel perform during the 79th Indonesian Military Anniversary celebrations at the National Monument (Monas) complex in Jakarta, Indonesia, October 5, 2024. REUTERS/Ajeng Dinar Ulfiana/File Photo
Police officers set up a barricade during a student protest against the passing of a new military law allowing active military personnel to hold more civilian posts, outside the parliament in Jakarta, Indonesia, Thursday, March 20, 2025. (AP Photo/Tatan Syuflana)

Overview

  • Indonesia's parliament has officially passed amendments to the 2004 armed forces law, allowing active-duty military personnel to hold civilian roles in agencies such as the Attorney General's Office and counter-terrorism bodies.
  • Rights groups warn the changes echo Suharto-era policies, potentially reinstating the military's 'dual function' in governance and threatening democratic progress.
  • Critics highlight risks of human rights violations and impunity, as military courts with a history of leniency will handle cases involving military personnel in civilian roles.
  • The government defends the amendments as necessary updates to outdated laws, stating that most military officers must resign before assuming civilian positions.
  • Protests by civil society groups and students are expected to continue, with a coalition of 186 organizations opposing the law and citing threats to democracy and judicial impartiality.