ICJ's 2024 Advisory Opinion on Israel Faces Intense Scrutiny
The International Court of Justice's recent opinion on Israel's occupation has sparked debates over its accuracy, bias, and potential impact on international law.
- The ICJ's opinion heavily relies on UN reports, drawing criticism for not using primary sources.
- Israel criticized the proceedings as biased, choosing not to participate in the hearings.
- The opinion labels Israel's occupation as prolonged and discriminatory, likening it to apartheid.
- Some judges argue the opinion underscores severe violations of international law by Israel.
- The non-binding nature of the opinion leaves its implementation dependent on international consensus.
The Jerusalem Post 
Just Security 
The Guardian 
Truthout 