Particle.news

Download on the App Store

ICJ Advisory Opinion Drives Uptick in Global Climate Litigation

Cited in courtrooms around the world, the non-binding July advisory is shaping claims for reparations; tougher emissions limits; enforcement of climate-related human rights duties.

Climate activists and campaigners demonstrate outside the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ahead of the reading of an advisory opinion that is likely to determine the course of future climate action across the world, The Hague, Netherlands, July 23, 2025. REUTERS/Marta Fiorin/File Photo
Image
Climate activists protest against fossil fuels at Dubai's Expo City during the United Nations Climate Change Conference COP28 in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, December 12, 2023. REUTERS/Thomas Mukoya/File Photo
Image

Overview

  • The ICJ unanimously ruled on July 23 that governments’ failure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and to regulate private actors may constitute internationally wrongful acts under both treaty and customary international law.
  • It affirmed that treaties such as the 2015 Paris Agreement are legally binding and that states granting fossil fuel exploration licenses and subsidies must provide monetary reparations and restore damaged infrastructure.
  • Lawyers have already cited the opinion in Ireland’s Supreme Court during a windfarm permit dispute and in an upcoming Dutch Bonaire v. Netherlands case challenging that country’s climate plan.
  • NGOs including Greenpeace Netherlands and Notre Affaire à Tous are preparing suits against governments and energy companies based on the ruling’s standards for state liability and reparations.
  • Legal scholars predict the advisory will catalyze domestic litigation, inter-state claims and enforcement of the 1.5°C Paris Agreement target as an enforceable standard grounded in customary environmental duties.