Particle.news

Download on the App Store

ICE Official Testifies on Use of Canary Mission Blacklist

A federal trial in Boston heard details of how a DHSTiger Team” reassigned intelligence analysts to vet over 5,000 student activists for visa revocation referrals.

Ramya Krishnan, senior staff attorney at the Knight First Amendment Institute, speaks about a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration over deporting students and faculty who took part in pro-Palestinian demonstrations on Monday, July 7, 2025, at the federal courthouse in Boston. (AP Photo/Michael Casey)
People show their support for a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's policy of targeting students for deportation who took part in pro-Palestinian demonstrations on Monday, July 7, 2025, at the federal courthouse in Boston. (AP Photo/Michael Casey)
People show their support for a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's policy of targeting students for deportation who took part in pro-Palestinian demonstrations on Monday, July 7, 2025, at the federal courthouse in Boston. (AP Photo/Michael Casey)
People show their support for a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration's policy of targeting students for deportation who took part in pro-Palestinian demonstrations on Monday, July 7, 2025, at the federal courthouse in Boston. (AP Photo/Michael Casey)

Overview

  • Peter Hatch, a senior ICE investigations official, acknowledged in court that “most” names in the probe originated from Canary Mission, an anonymously run pro-Israel blacklist.
  • HSI formed the Tiger Team in March 2025 by moving analysts from counterterrorism, global trade and cybercrime units to handle the surge of more than 5,000 profiles.
  • Hatch said DHS analysts did not treat Canary Mission as authoritative and conducted independent investigations before compiling reports for the State Department.
  • The Tiger Team produced roughly 100 to 200 detailed analyses on individuals, including cases leading to detentions and visa cancellations of students like Mahmoud Khalil and Rümeysa Öztürk.
  • U.S. District Judge William Young will determine whether the Trump administration’s ideological deportation policy, informed by third-party blacklists, violated First Amendment and due process protections.