Particle.news

Download on the App Store

House Republicans Challenge University Leaders on Campus Antisemitism

Republicans threatened to cut funding unless universities tightened discipline at the ninth hearing, prompting officials to underscore their free-speech safeguards.

Dr. Félix Matos Rodríguez, Chancellor, The City University of New York, testifies during a House Committee on Education and Workforce Committee hearing on "Antisemitism in Higher Education: Examining the Role of Faculty, Funding, and Ideology" on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, July 15, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Rod Lamkey, Jr.)
Dr. Rich Lyons, Chancellor, University of California, Berkeley, testifies during a House Committee on Education and Workforce Committee hearing on "Antisemitism in Higher Education: Examining the Role of Faculty, Funding, and Ideology" on Capitol Hill, Tuesday, July 15, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Rod Lamkey, Jr.)
Two weeks after the Hamas attack on southern Israel in October, 2023, hundreds of students gathered on UC Berkeley’s Sproul Plaza to call for a cease fire and end to the subsequent Israeli invasion of Gaza.

Overview

  • Republicans on the House Education and the Workforce Committee accused the three universities of permitting an antisemitic climate and warned they could withhold federal funds for inadequate responses.
  • Lyons, Groves and Matos Rodríguez detailed campus actions—from disciplinary measures and mandatory training to security funding and dialogue initiatives—aimed at combating antisemitism while preserving free speech.
  • Democrats decried the session as a 'kangaroo court' and criticized President Trump’s cuts to the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights for undermining civil rights enforcement.
  • CUNY reported receiving 68 antisemitism complaints last year and disciplining 18 students over two years, while Georgetown placed a professor on leave for an antisemitic social media post.
  • This was the ninth hearing since October 2023, following high-profile resignations of Ivy League presidents whose testimonies before the same committee drew sharp criticism.