Particle.news
Download on the App Store

House Hearing on 'Judea and Samaria' Centers on Trump's No-Annexation Stance

Lawmakers clashed over whether Trump's statement precludes extending Israeli civil law to settlements.

Overview

  • At a House Foreign Affairs subcommittee session titled “Understanding Judea and Samaria,” members and witnesses debated sovereignty, annexation, and the terminology used for the West Bank.
  • Eugene Kontorovich argued that under the uti possidetis juris principle, Israel holds a strong sovereign claim based on Mandatory Palestine’s boundaries.
  • Democrats and expert Jon Alterman warned that annexation could disenfranchise Palestinians and undercut U.S. opposition to Russia’s land grabs in Ukraine.
  • Participants said neither full annexation nor a conventional two-state solution is currently feasible, as alternatives such as limited autonomy models were floated.
  • Proceedings turned testy with a shouting match between Reps. Mike Lawler and Brad Sherman, and Code Pink activists were removed after confronting Israeli settlement leaders.