Overview
- The court granted a four-week interim stay on August 7 and scheduled the next hearing for September 10 to review the state’s response
- Justices Anupinder Singh Grewal and Deepak Manchanda said the policy was notified in haste without mandatory Social and Environmental Impact Assessments
- The order highlighted a lack of defined execution timelines, absence of grievance redressal procedures and no rehabilitation provisions for land-dependent labourers
- Clause 6 of the scheme could trigger compulsory acquisition of non-pooled land under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act despite the government calling it voluntary
- The state must also clarify budget allocations to finance development across more than 65,000 acres spanning 21 towns