Particle.news

Download on the App Store

High Court Allows Palestine Action to Challenge UK Terrorism Ban

A judge ruled that the failure to consult Palestine Action before proscription justifies a full judicial review on grounds of undue restrictions on free speech along with assembly rights.

A demonstrator waves a flag outside the High Court in London where a full hearing on an application for a judicial review by Palestine Action against its impending proscription is being heard, Monday, July 21, 2025. (AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth)
Image
Image
Image

Overview

  • Justice Martin Chamberlain found two grounds — lack of consultation and disproportionate interference with expression and assembly — to be reasonably arguable and approved a substantive hearing.
  • The proscription under the Terrorism Act 2000 classifies membership or support of Palestine Action as a crime punishable by up to 14 years in prison and restricts wearing its insignia.
  • Since coming into effect on July 5, police have arrested more than 100 people for demonstrating support for the group, raising concerns over a chilling effect on protest and press freedom.
  • The Home Office, represented by Sir James Eadie KC, argues that serious damage to RAF Brize Norton Voyager aircraft and political intent fall squarely within terrorism legislation.
  • UN rights experts and civil liberties organisations have criticised the proscription as a misuse of counter-terror powers and urged dedicated legislation for disruptive activism.