Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Hawley Challenges UPenn Professor Over Record Nationwide Injunctions

Their confrontation underscored deep partisan divides over the judiciary’s role in checking Trump, igniting debate over limits on executive power.

Image
Image
Image
Image

Overview

  • At a Senate Judiciary subcommittee hearing on June 3, Sen. Josh Hawley pressed UPenn law professor Kate Shaw on why district judges have issued a record number of nationwide injunctions blocking President Trump’s policies.
  • Hawley presented data showing injunctions against Trump far exceed those issued under other recent presidents and argued judges invoke them selectively based on the president’s party.
  • Shaw replied that the high volume of injunctions plausibly reflects more lawless activity by the administration and cited legal scholarship tracing the practice back to the early 20th century.
  • The Missouri senator accused Shaw of hypocrisy by highlighting her past criticisms of injunctions used against the Biden administration, saying her stance shifted with the party in the White House.
  • Shaw warned that recent attacks by government officials on federal judges represent an unprecedented threat to judicial independence and risk leaving the presidency without meaningful constraints.