Harvey Weinstein's Appeal Heard by New York's Highest Court

Weinstein's legal team argues for conviction overturn, citing trial biases and excessive testimonies.

Harvey Weinstein's lawyers argue his 2020 rape conviction was unfair, citing biased rulings and the inclusion of excessive testimonies from women not part of the case.
Weinstein, serving a 23-year sentence for rape and sexual assault, seeks a new trial for the criminal sexual act charge, claiming the rape charge is outside the statute of limitations.
The appeal challenges the trial judge's decisions, including allowing testimonies about Weinstein's past misconduct and a juror who wrote a novel involving predatory older men.
Weinstein's conviction played a pivotal role in the #MeToo movement, with his trial drawing intense publicity and protests.
New York's highest court appears divided on the appeal, with no immediate ruling expected.