Guatemala's Supreme Court Selection Criticized for Lack of Reform
Observers claim the new justices are influenced by powerful interests, undermining President Arévalo's anti-corruption efforts.
- Guatemala's Congress has appointed 13 new Supreme Court justices for five-year terms, amid widespread criticism of the selection process.
- International observers, including the OAS and UN, reported meddling and threats during the nomination process, raising concerns about judicial independence.
- President Bernardo Arévalo, who lacks a congressional majority, faces challenges in his anti-corruption agenda due to the influence of powerful interests in the justice system.
- Critics argue that many of the selected justices have ties to special interest groups and do not guarantee judicial independence.
- The selection process has been described as irregular, with calls for reform to ensure candidates are both honorable and professionally qualified.