Overview
- A North Dakota jury has ordered Greenpeace to pay over $665 million in damages to Energy Transfer for its role in protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline.
- Greenpeace plans to appeal the ruling, calling it a 'Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation' (SLAPP) designed to silence dissent.
- The lawsuit accused Greenpeace of defamation and incitement to violence during the 2016-2017 protests led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, which sought to protect sacred sites and water sources.
- The judgment has sparked fears of a chilling effect on environmental protests and freedom of expression, particularly in jurisdictions without anti-SLAPP protections.
- Greenpeace has also filed a case in the Netherlands under European anti-SLAPP laws, seeking to counter Energy Transfer's legal actions and recover legal costs.