Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Government Stands By Parliamentary CGPJ Picks After Venice Commission Critique

The justice minister rules out changing the model despite an opinion favoring judge-led selection that flags politicization risks.

Overview

  • The Venice Commission's final opinion finds that allowing Parliament to choose the 12 judicial members is vulnerable to politicization and falls short of European standards.
  • It welcomes direct election by judges as meeting the 'peer selection' norm, provided safeguards are added to curb internal politicization linked to judicial associations.
  • Recommended safeguards include limiting how many candidates each voter can back and guaranteeing broad representation across the judiciary to prevent corporatism.
  • The government downplays the critique, maintains there is no single mandatory European model, and defends parliamentary voting as providing democratic legitimacy.
  • Judicial groups AJFV and FJI urge the CGPJ to incorporate the opinion and send a reform proposal to Congress, while CGPJ sources say further action now rests with the executive and lawmakers.