Google Antitrust Trial Concludes Evidentiary Phase

Judge Amit Mehta Admits Uncertainty on Ruling, Decision Expected in 2024

Google's antitrust trial with the Department of Justice and State Attorneys General has concluded its evidentiary phase. The trial focused on allegations that Google used its monopoly over internet search to freeze out competitors and favor its own bottom line.
Google argued that its success is due to constant innovation and quality, and that its large market share is not due to anti-competitive practices but because users prefer its search engine. The company also highlighted its investments in mobile and its competition with a broad range of competitors, not just general search engines.
US District Judge Amit Mehta, who will determine the outcome of the trial, admitted that he still has 'no idea' how he expects to rule. Closing arguments are set for May 2023, meaning a final ruling is still months away.
During the trial, the Justice Department argued that Google relies on massive payments to partners like Apple and AT&T to ensure its search engine is enabled by default on most products. The department also called witnesses who testified that changing the default search engine is a complicated process for many users.
If Google is found to have broken the law, a second trial will be held to determine an appropriate remedy. This could include changes such as requiring Google to implement a 'choice screen' for users, or larger ones, such as forcing the company to discontinue certain business practices or even sell off parts of its business.