Gilgo Beach Suspect Challenges DNA Evidence and Seeks Separate Trials

Rex Heuermann's defense questions the reliability of DNA analysis and argues for dividing the case into multiple trials.

Prosecutors and defense attorneys are set to debate the admissibility of nuclear DNA evidence in the Gilgo Beach serial killings case during a Frye Hearing scheduled for February 18.
Rex Heuermann's defense team contends that the DNA analysis technique used by Astrea Forensics has not been widely accepted in the scientific community or tested in New York courts.
The prosecution maintains that the DNA evidence, corroborated by mitochondrial DNA testing, is scientifically sound and has been peer-reviewed and accepted in various fields.
Heuermann’s attorneys are also requesting that the seven murder charges be divided into separate trials, citing differences in evidence, methods, and timelines of the alleged killings spanning nearly two decades.
The Suffolk County District Attorney's Office opposes separating the cases, arguing that the evidence demonstrates a clear pattern of intent across all seven alleged murders.