Overview
- The Higher Regional Court in Hamm dismissed Saul Luciano Lliuya’s €17,000 claim against RWE after finding only a 1% chance that a glacial lake flood would reach his home within 30 years.
- Judges held for the first time that energy companies can face civil liability for greenhouse gas emissions causing climate-related harms, even when victims reside abroad.
- The ruling concludes a decade-long battle and bars further appeal by Lliuya but provides legal footing for more than 40 similar climate damages cases worldwide.
- The court recognised scientific links between emissions and climate risks dating back to the 1958 Keeling Curve and stated that regulatory permits do not exempt companies from third-party liability.
- RWE argued that climate responsibility belongs to political and regulatory fora rather than courts and said the decision did not create binding precedent in other legal systems.