Overview
- The Federal Constitutional Court declared the plaintiff’s challenge to MDR broadcasting fees for 2014–2015 inadmissible on procedural grounds.
- Judges found he failed to present his transparency and independence concerns first to the relevant administrative courts.
- The dispute revolved around roughly €300 in fees and allegations that MDR oversight bodies lacked sufficient state separation and openness.
- In its decision the court did not examine the substance of his claims about nontransparent oversight or program diversity.
- MDR’s 2021 state treaty reforms had already capped state-affiliated members in its oversight bodies at one third and enhanced transparency.