Particle.news

Download on the App Store

French Health Experts Refocus Food Risk Debate on Sugar Over Trace Contaminants

Anses leaders urge dose-based choices to counter alarmist messaging.

Overview

  • Specialists warn that a wave of alarming claims about cadmium, aspartame and heavy metals is confusing consumers and leading to poorer decisions.
  • Experts say harms from excess sugar far exceed risks from low-dose contaminants or sweeteners, with diet soda preferable to sugary versions though water remains the best option.
  • UFC-Que Choisir’s example of a child’s cocoa-and-cereal snack nearing half the cadmium limit mainly violates sugar guidelines rather than posing a primary metal risk.
  • Anses emphasizes dose over absolutes, advising one weekly serving of salmon for omega-3s despite metal content and limiting red meat to 500 grams per week.
  • Researchers highlight industry-funded ‘science marketing’ that skews studies, while Nutri-Score is cited as a helpful guide that remains voluntary and faces resistance from major manufacturers.