Particle.news

Download on the App Store

French Court Dismisses Grataloup Family’s Claim Against Bayer-Monsanto

The tribunal said there was no proof of maternal glyphosate use in 2006, prompting the family to announce their intention to appeal.

Image
Le tribunal de Vienne a jugé irrecevable jeudi 31 juillet 2025 la demande des parents de Théo Grataloup, de lier ses malformations congénitales à l’exposition à un herbicide de Bayer-Monsanto. Photo : Théo Grataloup et sa mère Sabine, le 17 mars 2025.
La justice déboute la famille Grataloup, qui accusait le glyphosate des malformations de leur fils Théo.
Théo Grataloup, 10 ans, atteint de graves malformations congénitales le 5 octobre 2017 à Moidieu-Détourbe près de Vienne, dans l'Isère

Overview

  • Tribunal judiciaire de Vienne ruled the family’s civil complaint inadmissible due to insufficient evidence linking Théo’s birth defects to glyphosate exposure.
  • The court highlighted the absence of invoices or records to confirm Sabine Grataloup’s use of Glyper herbicide during her 2006 pregnancy.
  • Bayer-Monsanto’s defense argued that Glyper was manufactured by Italian firm Novafito and denied any causal responsibility for Théo’s malformations.
  • Regulatory authorities such as INRS, EFSA and ECHA have maintained that glyphosate shows no teratogenic effects at non-toxic exposure levels.
  • The Grataloup family, whose son endured 55 surgeries for severe esophageal and tracheal malformations, plans to appeal and continue seeking accountability.