Overview

• The court sided with DeSantis, rejecting a pseudonymous public records request for information on judicial appointments.
• The request sought details on conservative advisors involved in Supreme Court justice selections.
• The ruling emphasized the need for more specific and narrowly tailored records requests.
• The court did not make a definitive ruling on the use of executive privilege in public records cases.
• Legal and advocacy groups argue that the decision could impact transparency and access to government records.