Fifth Circuit Declares Geofence Warrants Unconstitutional
The ruling marks a significant shift in digital privacy law, creating a split with other circuits and questioning the validity of broad digital searches.
- The 5th Circuit Court ruled that geofence warrants violate the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches.
- This decision conflicts with the 4th Circuit and Colorado Supreme Court, which upheld the use of these warrants.
- Geofence warrants require providers like Google to search vast databases to identify users within a specific area and time frame.
- The court upheld the evidence in the case due to law enforcement's good faith reliance on the warrants.
- Experts and digital rights groups consider the ruling a major victory for privacy, impacting future digital surveillance practices.