Federal Lawsuit Challenges Flock Safety's Warrantless Surveillance

A lawsuit claims Flock Safety's ALPR cameras in Norfolk, Virginia, infringe on Fourth Amendment rights by enabling warrantless monitoring.

The lawsuit, filed by the Institute for Justice, targets the use of over 170 Flock Safety cameras in Norfolk, arguing they create an unconstitutional surveillance dragnet.
Flock Safety's cameras capture detailed vehicle data, raising concerns about privacy and the potential for profiling and discriminatory deployment.
Critics argue that the cameras allow law enforcement to track individuals' movements without warrants, violating Fourth Amendment protections.
Supporters of the technology cite its benefits in crime-solving and public safety, emphasizing the need for proper oversight and policies.
The case draws on legal precedents like Carpenter v. United States, highlighting the need to balance privacy rights with public safety advancements.