Overview

• The lawsuit, filed by the Institute for Justice, targets the use of over 170 Flock Safety cameras in Norfolk, arguing they create an unconstitutional surveillance dragnet.
• Flock Safety's cameras capture detailed vehicle data, raising concerns about privacy and the potential for profiling and discriminatory deployment.
• Critics argue that the cameras allow law enforcement to track individuals' movements without warrants, violating Fourth Amendment protections.
• Supporters of the technology cite its benefits in crime-solving and public safety, emphasizing the need for proper oversight and policies.
• The case draws on legal precedents like Carpenter v. United States, highlighting the need to balance privacy rights with public safety advancements.