Federal Judges Block Key Sections of Trump’s Retaliatory Orders Against Law Firms

Trump's executive orders targeting firms linked to his political adversaries face mounting legal setbacks as some firms strike deals while others continue to fight in court.

Federal judges issued temporary restraining orders halting significant parts of Trump's executive orders against Jenner & Block and WilmerHale, citing likely constitutional violations.
Trump's actions, which include revoking security clearances and restricting federal access, are widely seen as retaliation against firms tied to investigations or litigation against him.
Paul Weiss and Skadden Arps have struck deals with the administration, committing to pro bono work totaling $140 million, while facing criticism for undermining legal independence.
The legal community remains divided, with some firms resisting Trump's orders in court and others capitulating under financial and reputational pressures.
Trump's broader pattern of targeting perceived adversaries, including universities and media organizations, has raised concerns about the erosion of free speech and legal norms.

San Francisco Chronicle