Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Federal Judge Voids Trump Administration’s NIH Grant Cuts as Discriminatory

The Department of Health and Human Services has announced plans to appeal Judge Young’s order overturning the grant cuts

Image
Image
The John Joseph Moakley US Courthouse where the detention hearing for Jack Teixeira is to be held, on April 19, 2023, in Boston, Massachusetts. - Teixeira, 21, an employee of the US Air Force National Guard, was charged with leaking a trove of classified US government documents as he made his first appearance in court April 14. Teixeira was arrested April 13 following a week-long probe into one of the most damaging leaks of secrets since the 2013 dump of National Security Agency documents by Edward Snowden. (Photo by Lauren Owens Lambert / AFP) (Photo by LAUREN OWENS LAMBERT/AFP via Getty Images)

Overview

  • Judge William Young ruled that the NIH’s termination of over $1 billion in research grants is illegal and void, describing it as racial and LGBTQ+ discrimination.
  • The order restores 367 grants awarded to researchers and 16 Democratic-led states that challenged the cancellations in federal court.
  • Young found that directives targeting diversity, equity and inclusion and gender identity research were arbitrary, lacked scientific justification and broke federal law.
  • HHS defended the original cuts as necessary to refocus funding on evidence-based science and said it will explore all legal options, including an appeal.
  • NIH director Jay Bhattacharya admitted the cuts went too far and is evaluating steps to reinstate affected grants to resume halted research.