Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Federal Judge Strikes Down California Deepfake Law Over Section 230 Preemption

The ruling paves the way for state leaders to seek fresh strategies for addressing AI-driven election misinformation.

Altadena, CA - February 11: Governor Gavin Newsom attends a press conference at Odyssey Charter School as work begins to remove debris from the Eaton Fire in Altadena, CA. (Juliana Yamada / Los Angeles Times)

Overview

  • On August 6, U.S. District Judge John Mendez invalidated AB 2655, finding California’s ban on AI-generated election videos conflicts with federal immunity for online platforms under Section 230.
  • Mendez ruled that no portion of the law is severable and signaled his intent to overturn AB 2839, the requirement to label digitally altered campaign materials, on First Amendment grounds.
  • The challenge began when Christopher Kohls sued over his AI-generated parody of then–Vice President Harris and was later joined by Elon Musk’s X, The Babylon Bee and Rumble on free speech claims.
  • Governor Gavin Newsom’s office said it is reviewing the decision and stressed that commonsense deepfake labeling remains vital to protect election integrity.
  • Legal analysts warn the verdict could influence future state efforts to regulate AI content, test the limits of platform liability and recalibrate the balance between misinformation control and free expression.