Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Federal Judge Plans Order Presuming Retaliation in Immigration Actions Against Pro‑Palestinian Academics

The forthcoming order stems from his finding that federal actions chilled campus speech by non‑citizen academics.

Overview

  • Judge William G. Young said he will issue the order on Jan. 22, creating a presumption that changes to the immigration status of covered individuals are retaliatory unless the government proves legitimate reasons.
  • The protection will apply only to members of the plaintiff academic groups, including AAUP and MESA, rather than as a nationwide injunction.
  • Young outlined that the government would bear the burden to justify any status changes, describing the measure as a tailored remedy to deter retribution against those who brought the suit.
  • At the Boston hearing, Young said senior officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, engaged in an “unconstitutional conspiracy” that chilled protected speech.
  • Hours before the hearing, a three‑judge appeals panel issued a 2–1 decision overturning a lower‑court ruling in the Mahmoud Khalil case, underscoring parallel legal battles as the Justice Department contests the district court’s authority and prepares to appeal.