Particle.news

Download on the App Store

Federal Judge Invalidates Trump-Era Contraception Exemptions

Finding no rational link between the agencies’ goals and the 2018 exemption rules under the Administrative Procedure Act, the court vacated the rules pending an appeal.

U.S. President Donald Trump takes a question from the press during a visit to the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C., U.S., August 13, 2025.  REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
Image
Sisters leave SCOTUS after oral arguments in 2020
Image

Overview

  • U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone ruled that the 2018 Religious and Moral Rules exempting employers from providing contraceptive coverage were arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act.
  • The court found the rules’ sweeping scope lacked a rational connection to the limited number of employers needing exemptions, undermining the agencies’ stated justification.
  • This merits-level vacatur is the first substantive judicial rejection of the Trump-era rules since their issuance and remands them to HHS, Labor and Treasury for further review.
  • The Little Sisters of the Poor, represented by the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, have said they will appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals with Supreme Court review possible.
  • The contested rules had removed application requirements and allowed nonprofits, for-profit and publicly traded firms to opt out of the ACA contraceptive mandate, prompting state lawsuits over projected costs to state health programs.